Supreme Court Showdown Casts Long Shadow Over Budget Talks
Veto Dispute OverviewA Wisconsin Supreme Court case, Wisconsin State Legislature v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, is delaying budget negotiations between Republican legislators and Governor Tony Evers. The case examines Evers’ use of partial veto power in the 2023-25 budget (2023 Act 19), where the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) allocated $50 million for a literacy […]
Published May 21, 2025

Veto Dispute Overview
A Wisconsin Supreme Court case, Wisconsin State Legislature v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, is delaying budget negotiations between Republican legislators and Governor Tony Evers. The case examines Evers’ use of partial veto power in the 2023-25 budget (2023 Act 19), where the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) allocated $50 million for a literacy initiative but retained control over fund distribution. Evers’ veto sought to give the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) more flexibility.

Legal Context
This follows a 2025 court ruling upholding Evers’ “400-year veto,” which extended school funding through 2425, affirming broad veto authority. The current dispute involves 2023 Act 100, where Evers vetoed parts of a funding mechanism, arguing it simplified the process. Legislators claim the bill was not an appropriation measure, making the veto unconstitutional.

Court and Budget Implications
The upcoming ruling could clarify the governor’s veto powers and the JFC’s authority over supplemental appropriations. A prior Dane County Circuit Court decision upheld Evers’ veto but did not release the $50 million, leaving key issues unresolved.

Negotiation Stance
Legislators are hesitant to finalize budget agreements until the court rules, citing uncertainty over veto authority. The decision could shape education funding and legislative-executive relations.

Broader Impact
The ruling may influence Wisconsin’s fiscal and governance framework, with stakeholders, including educators, closely monitoring its outcome.